|
|
Post by abbo55 on Dec 6, 2006 21:35:09 GMT -5
Has anyone ran Triple from the offset I? What were the results? Was the mesh with the fullback a problem? I've never seen it, and it was just a random thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by coachveer on Dec 7, 2006 9:38:05 GMT -5
Hi Coach,
Are you asking if you can run triple with the FB from 2 different positions. We always wanted to mesh from one mesh point. When we change the FB position on triple our mesh gets alittle slow. If you want to run triple form the offset I then you may only want to run triple out of the offset I. Now, some teams can do it from both positions. We just never could.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbo55 on Dec 7, 2006 18:25:20 GMT -5
You answered my question. I don't need a slow mesh. I might give it a shot. Thanks for your input!
|
|
|
|
Post by olinecoach61 on Dec 7, 2006 20:18:28 GMT -5
I would also be hesitant to change the mesh point. It could lead to a lot of problems and greatly increase the reps you need to get down the steps / mesh.
|
|
|
|
Post by midlineqb on Dec 11, 2006 17:18:38 GMT -5
by changing the mesh point it takes twice as much teaching of the mesh.
|
|
|
|
Post by coachveer on Dec 13, 2006 8:09:07 GMT -5
Coach,
Slow to us means slow reads for the QB and FB not running at full speed. Slow is bad for a couple of reasons. It allows defenders to play both dive/keep or keep/pitch. It also means our QB reads percent is lower then it should be.
|
|
|
|
Post by jturner on Apr 21, 2011 22:20:16 GMT -5
I'll offer one positive angle. You might be able to use the offset fullback to marry the Split back Outside Veer with the regular I Form stuff you might run. I'm just thinking that would help a bunch against a team that is running an under front and giving you fits. I do agree with other guys on here, that it will probably slow you're guys down a tad, but if you practice it enough you should be good.
|
|
